Sunday, 22 November 2015

Cyberbullying



Cyberbullying

With the increased use of communication technology, cyberbullying has become increasingly common, especially among teenagers. Awareness has also risen, due in part to high-profile cases like the suicide of Tyler Clementi.

What is cyberbullying?

Cyberbullying is the act of harming or harassing via information technology networks in a repeated and deliberate manner. According to U.S. Legal Definitions, "cyber-bullying could be limited to posting rumors or gossips about a person in the internet bringing about hatred in other’s minds; or it may go to the extent of personally identifying victims and publishing materials severely defaming and humiliating them."

Traditional bullying


Certain characteristics inherent in online technologies increase the likelihood that they will be exploited for deviant purposes.[9] Unlike physical bullying, electronic bullies can remain virtually anonymous using temporary email accounts, pseudonyms in chat rooms, instant messaging programs, cell-phone text messaging, and other Internet venues to mask their identity; this perhaps frees them from normative and social constraints on their behavior.

Additionally, electronic forums often lack supervision. While chat hosts regularly observe the dialog in some chat rooms in an effort to police conversations and evict offensive individuals, personal messages sent between users (such as electronic mail or text messages) are viewable only by the sender and the recipient, thereby falling outside the regulatory reach of such authorities. In addition, when teenagers know more about computers and cellular phones than their parents or guardians, they are therefore able to operate the technologies without concern that a parent will discover their experience with bullying (whether as a victim or offender).

Another factor is the inseparability of a cellular phone from its owner, making that person a perpetual target forvictimization. Users often need to keep their phone turned on for legitimate purposes, which provides the opportunity for those with malicious intentions to engage in persistent unwelcome behavior such as harassing telephone calls or threatening and insulting statements via the cellular phone’s text messaging capabilities. Cyberbullying thus penetrates the walls of a home, traditionally a place where victims could seek refuge from other forms of bullying. Compounding this infiltration into the home life of the cyberbully victim is the unique way in which the internet can "create simultaneous sensations of exposure (the whole world is watching) and alienation (no one understands)."[15] For youth who experience shame or self-hatred, this effect is dangerous because it can lead to extreme self-isolation.

One possible advantage for victims of cyberbullying over traditional bullying is that they may sometimes be able to avoid it simply by avoiding the site/chat room in question. Email addresses and phone numbers can be changed; in addition, most email accounts now offer services that will automatically filter out messages from certain senders before they even reach the inbox, and phones offer similar caller ID functions.

However, this does not protect against all forms of cyberbullying. Publishing of defamatory material about a person on the internet is extremely difficult to prevent and once it is posted, many people or archiving services can potentially download and copy it, at which point it is almost impossible to remove from the Internet. Some perpetrators may post victims' photos, or victims' edited photos featuring defaming captions or pasting victims' faces on nude bodies. Examples of famous forums for disclosing personal data or photos to "punish" the "enemies" include the Hong Kong Golden ForumLivejournal, and more recently JuicyCampus. Despite policies that describe cyberbullying as a violation of the terms of service, many social networking Web sites have been used to that end.[16]

Cyberbullying is sometimes used by the targets of bullying to retaliate against their bullies, since factors such as anonymity, absence of the bully's supporting friends, and irrelevancy of physical strength in the online environment, make it safer to counterattack the bully by that means. Nancy E. Willard notes in Cyberbullying and Cyberthreats, "Unfortunately, students who retaliate against bullies online can be mistakenly perceived as the source of the problem. This can be especially true under circumstances where the original victimization left no tangible evidence, but the cyberbullying did."[17]

Methods used

Manuals to educate the public, teachers and parents summarize, "Cyberbullying is being cruel to others by sending or posting harmful material using a cell phone or the internet." Research, legislation and education in the field are ongoing. Basic definitions and guidelines to help recognize and cope with what is regarded as abuse of electronic communications have been identified.
  • Cyberbullying involves repeated behavior with intent to harm.
  • Cyberbullying is perpetrated through harassmentcyberstalking, denigration (sending or posting cruel rumors and falsehoods to damage reputation and friendships), impersonation, and exclusion (intentionally and cruelly excluding someone from an online group)[18]

In social media

Cyberbullying can take place on social media sites such as Facebook, Myspace, and Twitter. “By 2008, 93% of young people between the ages of 12 and 17 were online. In fact, youth spend more time with media than any single other activity besides sleeping.”[21] There are many risks attached to social media sites, and cyberbullying is one of the larger risks. One million children were harassed, threatened or subjected to other forms of cyberbullying on Facebook during the past year, while 90 percent of social-media-using teens who have witnessed online cruelty say they have ignored mean behavior on social media, and 35 percent have done this frequently. 95 percent of social-media-using teens who have witnessed cruel behavior on social networking sites say they have seen others ignoring the mean behavior, and 55 percent witness this frequently.[22] According to a 2013 Pew Research study, eight out of 10 teens who use social media share more information about themselves than they have in the past. This includes location, images, and contact information.[23] ”The most recent case of cyber-bullying and illegal activity on Facebook involved a memorial page for the young boys who lost their lives to suicide due to anti-gay bullying. The page quickly turned into a virtual grave desecration and platform condoning gay teen suicide and the murdering of homosexuals. Photos were posted of executed homosexuals, desecrated photos of the boys who died and supposed snuff photos of gays who have been murdered. Along with this were thousands of comments encouraging murder sprees against gays, encouragement of gay teen suicide, death threats etc. In addition, the page continually exhibited pornography to minors.”[24] In order to protect children, it’s important that personal information such as age, birthday, school/church, phone number, etc. be kept confidential.[25]

In gaming

Sexual harassment as a form of cyberbullying is common in video game culture.[29] A study by the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology suggests that this harassment is due in part to the portrayal of women in video games.[29] This harassment generally involves slurs directed towards women, sex role stereotyping, and overaggressive language.[30]
In one case, in which Capcom sponsored an internet-streamed reality show pitting fighting game experts against each other for a prize of $25,000, one female gamer forfeited a match due to intense harassment.[31] The coach of the opposing team, Aris Bakhtanians, stated, "The sexual harassment is part of the culture. If you remove that from the fighting game community, it's not the fighting game community… it doesn't make sense to have that attitude. These things have been established for years."[31]
A study from National Sun Yat-sen University observed that children who enjoyed violent video games were far more likely to both experience and perpetrate cyberbullying.[32]

Law enforcement

A majority of states have laws that explicitly include electronic forms of communication within stalking or harassment laws.[33][34]
Most law enforcement agencies have cyber-crime units and often Internet stalking is treated with more seriousness than reports of physical stalking.[35] Help and resources can be searched by state or area.

Schools

The safety of schools is increasingly becoming a focus of state legislative action. There was an increase in cyberbullying enacted legislation between 2006–2010.[36] Initiatives and curriclulum requirements also exist in the UK (the Ofsted eSafety guidance) and Australia (Overarching Learning Outcome 13). In 2012, a group of teens in New Haven, Connecticut developed an app to help fight bullying. Called "Back Off Bully" (BOB), the web app is an anonymous resource for computer, smart phone or iPad. When someone witnesses or is the victim of bullying, they can immediately report the incident. The app asks questions about time, location and how the bullying is happening. As well as providing positive action and empowerment over an incident, the reported information helps by going to a data base where administrators study it. Common threads are spotted so others can intervene and break the bully's pattern.[37] BOB, the brainchild of fourteen teens in a design class, is being considered as standard operating procedure at schools across the state.

Protection

There are laws that only address online harassment of children or focus on child predators as well as laws that protect adult cyberstalking victims, or victims of any age. Currently, there are 45 cyberstalking (and related) laws on the books.
While some sites specialize in laws that protect victims age 18 and under, Working to Halt Online Abuse is a help resource containing a list of current and pending cyberstalking-related United States federal and state laws.[38] It also lists those states that do not have laws yet and related laws from other countries. The Global Cyber Law Database (GCLD) aims to become the most comprehensive and authoritative source of cyber laws for all countries.[39]

Age

Children report being mean to each other online beginning as young as 2nd grade. According to research, boys initiate mean online activity earlier than girls do. However, by middle school, girls are more likely to engage in cyberbullying than boys.[40] Whether the bully is male or female, his or her purpose is to intentionally embarrass others, harass, intimidate, or make threats online to one another. This bullying occurs via email, text messaging, posts to blogs, and web sites.
The National Crime Prevention Association lists tactics often used by teen cyberbullies.[41]
  • Pretend they are other people online to trick others
  • Spread lies and rumors about victims
  • Trick people into revealing personal information
  • Send or forward mean text messages
  • Post pictures of victims without their consent
Studies in the psychosocial effects of cyberspace have begun to monitor the impacts cyberbullying may have on the victims, and the consequences it may lead to. Consequences of cyberbullying are multi-faceted, and affect online and offline behavior. Research on adolescents reported that changes in the victims' behavior as a result of cyberbullying could be positive. Victims "created a cognitive pattern of bullies, which consequently helped them to recognize aggressive people."[42] However, the Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace abstract reports critical impacts in almost all of the respondents’, taking the form of lower self-esteem, loneliness, disillusionment, and distrust of people. The more extreme impacts were self-harm. Children have killed each other and committed suicide after having been involved in a cyberbullying incident.[43]
The most current research in the field defines cyberbullying as "an aggressive, intentional act or behaviour that is carried out by a group or an individual repeatedly and over time against a victim who cannot easily defend him or herself" (Smith & Slonje, 2007, p. 249).[42] Though the use of sexual remarks and threats are sometimes present in cyberbullying, it is not the same as sexual harassment, typically occurs among peers, and does not necessarily involve sexual predators.
Some cases of digital self-harm have been reported, where an individual engages in cyberbullying against themselves.[44][45]

Adults

Stalking online has criminal consequences just as physical stalking. A target's understanding of why cyberstalking is happening is helpful to remedy and take protective action to restore remedy. Cyberstalking is an extension of physical stalking.[46] Among factors that motivate stalkers are: envy, pathological obsession (professional or sexual), unemployment or failure with own job or life; intention to intimidate and cause others to feel inferior; the stalker is delusional and believes he/she "knows" the target; the stalker wants to instill fear in a person to justify his/her status; belief they can get away with it (anonymity).[47] UK National Workplace Bullying Advice Line theorizes that bullies harass victims in order to make up for inadequacies in their own lives.[48]
The US federal cyberstalking law is designed to prosecute people for using electronic means to repeatedly harass or threaten someone online. There are resources dedicated to assisting adult victims deal with cyberbullies legally and effectively. One of the steps recommended is to record everything and contact police.[49][50]

Harmful effects

Research had demonstrated a number of serious consequences of cyberbullying victimization.[9][70][71][78] For example, victims have lower self-esteem, increased suicidal ideation, and a variety of emotional responses, retaliating, being scared, frustrated, angry, and depressed.[78] People have reported that Cyberbullying can be more harmful than traditional bullying because there is no escaping it.[93]
One of the most damaging effects is that a victim begins to avoid friends and activities, often the very intention of the cyberbully.
Cyberbullying campaigns are sometimes so damaging that victims have committed suicide. There are at least four examples in the United States where cyberbullying has been linked to the suicide of a teenager.[78] The suicide of Megan Meier is a recent example that led to the conviction of the adult perpetrator of the attacks.
According to Lucie Russell, director of campaigns, policy and participation at youth mental health charity Young Minds, young people who suffer from mental disorder are vulnerable to cyberbullying as they are sometimes unable to shrug it off:
When someone says nasty things healthy people can filter that out, they're able to put a block between that and their self-esteem. But mentally unwell people don't have the strength and the self-esteem to do that, to separate it, and so it gets compiled with everything else. To them, it becomes the absolute truth – there's no filter, there's no block. That person will take that on, take it as fact.[94]
Social media has allowed bullies to disconnect from the impact they may be having on others.[95]

Intimidation, emotional damage, suicide

According to the Cyberbullying Research Center, "there have been several high‐profile cases involving teenagers taking their own lives in part because of being harassed and mistreated over the Internet, a phenomenon we have termed cyberbullicide – suicide indirectly or directly influenced by experiences with online aggression."
Cyberbullying is an intense form of psychological abuse, whose victims are more than twice as likely to suffer from mental disorders compared to traditional bullying.[96]
The reluctance youth have in telling an authority figure about instances of cyberbullying has led to fatal outcomes. At least three children between the ages of 12 and 13 have committed suicide due to depression brought on by cyberbullying, according to reports by USA Today and the Baltimore Examiner. These would include the suicide of Ryan Halligan and thesuicide of Megan Meier, the latter of which resulted in United States v. Lori Drew.
More recently, teenage suicides tied to cyberbullying have become more prevalent. The latest victim of cyberbullying through the use of mobile applications was Rebecca Ann Sedwick, who committed suicide after being terrorized through mobile applications such as Ask.fmKik Messenger and Voxer.[97]

Awareness

Campaigns

International

The Cybersmile Foundation is a cyberbullying charity committed to tackling all forms of online bullying, abuse and hate campaigns. The charity was founded in 2010 in response to the increasing number of cyberbullying related incidents ofdepressioneating disorders, social isolation, self-harm and suicides devastating lives around the world. Cybersmile provides support to victims and their friends and families through social media interaction, email and helpline support. They also run an annual event, Stop Cyberbullying Day, to draw attention to the issue.

In media and pop culture

  • Adina's Deck— a film about three 8th-graders who help their friend who's been cyberbullied.
  • Let's Fight It Together— a film produced by Childnet International to be used in schools to support discussion and awareness-raising around cyberbullying.
  • Odd Girl Out— a film about a girl who is bullied at school and online.
  • At a Distance— a short film produced by NetSafe for the 8-12-year-old audience. It highlights forms and effects of cyberbullying and the importance of bystanders.
  • Cyberbully— a TV movie broadcast July 17, 2011 on ABC Family.It depicts a teenage girl who is a subjected to a campaign of bullying through social networking site.
  • The Casual Vacancy – a young girl is subjected to harassing images repeatedly posted on her Facebook page.
  • The Truth about Truman School, a 2008 children's book about a middle school girl who is cyberbullied by one of her classmates
  • Chatroom, a 2010 British thriller film directed by Hideo Nakata about five teenagers who meet on the internet and encourage each other's bad behaviour.
  • Star Wars: Jedi Academy: Return of the Padawan, a 2014 book by Jeffrey Brown features cyberbullying on "Holobook," a fictionalized Star Wars version of Facebook.
  • "URL, Interrupted," an episode of CSI: Cyber, featured a storyline about a girl named Zoe Tan who was watched through her computer via malware and cyberbullied with a website called "Kill Yourself Zoe Tan."

Tuesday, 17 November 2015

Pray for Paris Movement

Pray for Paris

Image result for france government in action against attack
On the evening of 13 November 2015 a series of coordinated terrorist attacks—consisting of mass shootings, suicide bombings and hostage-taking—occurred in Paris, France and Saint-Denis, its northern suburb. Beginning at 21:16 CET, six mass shootings and three separate suicide bombings near the Stade de France occurred. The deadliest attack was at the Bataclan theatre, where attackers took hostages and engaged in a stand-off with police which ended at 00:58 on 14 November.

Who led the attack?

On 14 November, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS) claimed responsibility for the attacks. Their motive was retaliation for French involvement in the Syrian Civil War and Iraqi Civil War. Hollande said the attacks were organised from abroad by ISIS, “with internal help”, and described them as “an act of war.” The attacks were the deadliest in France since the Second World War, and the deadliest in the European Union since the Madrid train bombings in 2004.

Why attack on France?

France’s military has been involved in airstrikes in Iraq and Syria since 19 September 2014, known by the codename of Operation Chammal. In October 2015, France struck targets in Syria for the first time. ISIL specially mentioned the airstrike campaign when they claimed responsibility for the attacks.
France had been on high alert for terrorist threats since the Charlie Hebdoshooting and a series of related attacks in early January 2015. France had also increased security in anticipation of the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference, scheduled to be held in Paris from 30 November to 11 December 2015, and had restored border checks the week before the attacks. The Charlie Hebdo shooting in January 2015 occurred in the 11th arrondissement (district) of the city, where the Bataclan theatre is situated.France witnessed several other smaller attacks throughout 2015, including the stabbing of three soldiers in Nice who were guarding a Jewish community centre in February; an attempt to blow up a factory in Saint-Quentin-Fallavier in June, resulting in the murder of an employee; and a shooting and stabbing spree on a train in August.
Two Jewish brothers, Pascal and Joel Laloux, owned the Bataclan theatre for more than forty years until they sold it in September 2015. They had said that the venue had been threatened several times because of their public support of Israel. In 2011, a group called “Army of Islam” threatened the theatre because of this.
Before the attack, ISIL and their branches have claimed responsibility for numerous deadly attacks within the weeks leading up to the attacks. On 12 November 2015, twin suicide bombings took place in Beirut, Lebanon, killing 43 people. On 31 October 2015, Metrojet Flight 9268, carrying mostly Russian passengers crashed in the Sinai in Egypt, killing 224 people.ISIL’s Sinai branch claimed responsibility. Also, on the day of the attacks, ISIL’s lead executioner Jihadi John was reportedly killed by a US drone strike and ISIL lost control of Sinjar to Kurdish forces.

Timeline of the series of attacks

13 November:

  • 21:16 – First suicide bombing near the Stade de France.
  • 21:20 – Second suicide bombing at the Stade de France.
  • 21:25 – Shooting at the rue Bichat.
  • 21:32 – Shooting at rue de la Fontaine-au-Roi.
  • 21:36 – Shooting at the rue de Charonne.
  • 21:40 – Suicide bombing onboulevard Voltaire.
  • 21:40 – Four men enter the Bataclan theatre and begin shooting.
  • 21:53 – Third suicide bombing at the Stade de France.
  • 22:00 – Hostages are taken at the Bataclan.

14 November:

  • 00:20 – Security forces enter the Bataclan.
  • 00:58 – French police end the siege on the Bataclan.
NOTE: All times are CET (UTC+1).

Details of the attacks at different locations

Seven distinct attacks took place, comprising four suicide bombings and six shootings. Three explosions occurred near the Stade de France and another onboulevard Voltaire; two of the Bataclan shooters also detonated their suicide vests as police ended the stand-off. Shootings were reported in the vicinity of the rue Alibert, the rue de la Fontaine-au-Roi, the rue de Charonne, the Bataclan theatre, and avenue de la République.

Stade de France explosions

Image result for Stade de France explosions
Three explosions occurred near the country’s national sports stadium, theStade de France, in the suburb of Saint-Denis, resulting in at least five deaths. The explosions happened at 21:16, 21:20, and 21:53. At least 10 people were injured or killed in an explosion at a bar near the stadium at approximately 21:20, 20 minutes after the start of an international friendly football match between France and Germany, which PresidentFrançois Hollande was attending. The first terrorist detonated his suicide vest while trying to enter Gate J of the stadium, killing at least three fans. Hollande was safely evacuated from the scene at half-time, while the German foreign ministerstayed, and Hollande met with his interior minister, Bernard Cazeneuve, to coordinate a response to the emergency. The third explosion was at a McDonald’s near the stadium. Two of the explosions were heard on the live televised broadcast of the match; both coaches were informed by French officials of a developing crisis, but players and the audience were kept unaware of the danger until the game had finished, as the coaches kept the information to themselves.
Following the game, fans were brought onto the pitch to await evacuation as police monitored all the exits around the venue. Security sources confirmed that all three explosions were suicide bombings. The Wall Street Journalreported that at least one of the assailants had a ticket for the football match, but was hindered from entering the stadium at the security check, at which point he detonated his vest. The attacks were seven months before France hosts the UEFA Euro 2016 tournament.

Rue Bichat and rue Alibert


The Le Petit Cambodge restaurant with a makeshift memorial of flowers, the day after the attacks
The first shootings occurred on the rue Bichat and the rue Alibert, near theCanal Saint-Martin in the 10th arrondissement. Attackers shot at people outside Le Carillon, a café-bar, at approximately 21:20. They then crossed the rue Bichat and attacked Le Petit Cambodge, a restaurant. According to French police, eleven people were killed at the restaurant, and an eyewitness said that one of the gunmen shouted “Allahu Akbar”. The assailants reportedly fled in one or two vehicles after the shootings. One of the vehicles was known to have had a Belgian number plate. Doctors and nurses from nearby Hôpital Saint-Louis were in Le Carillon when the attacks occurred and supplied emergency assistance to the wounded after the attack.

Rue de la Fontaine-au-Roi

Image result for Rue de la Fontaine-au-Roi attack
Shots were fired at the terrace of La Casa Nostra, an Italian restaurant, on the rue de la Fontaine-au-Roi, south of the rue Bichat, by a man with a machine gun. The Paris prosecutor reported that five people were killed and eight were injured. An eyewitness reported a gunman firing short bursts.

Rue de Charonne

Image result for Rue de Charonne attack
Two attackers fired for several minutes at the outdoor terrace of La Belle Équipe, a restaurant on the rue de Charonne in the 11th arrondissement before returning to their car and driving away at approximately 21:50. Police confirmed that 18 people were killed.

Boulevard Voltaire

Image result for Boulevard Voltaire attack
Another attacker detonated his suicide vest on the boulevard Voltaire, also in the 11th arrondissement, near place de la Nation. At about 21:40, he sat down in the cafe Comptoir Voltaire and placed an order before detonating his suicide vest and killing himself. About 15 people were injured, one of them seriously.

Bataclan theatre massacre

Image result for Bataclan theatre massacre
A mass shooting and hostage taking occurred at the Bataclan theatre on the boulevard Voltaire in the 11th arrondissement. The Bataclan had been owned by a Jewish family for decades and was sold to new owners in September, 2015.  The venue has been threatened repeatedly for sponsoring many pro-Israel events, including celebrations honoring Magav, the border police of the Israeli army. In 2008 masked pro-Palestinian protesters demanded that Le Bataclan stop hosting these pro-Israel events and stated that if they continued then Bataclan “…. will pay the consequences of your actions. The next time it will not come to talk.” In 2011 a group named “Army of Islam” threatened the Bataclan, apparently because its owners were Jewish.
The US rock band Eagles of Death Metal were playing for roughly 1,500 people. The band was condemned by anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) activists for playing in Israel.
The band had played around five songs when the explosions occurred, causing confusion among the audience that these explosions might have been part of the show. At approximately 21:45, about an hour into the concert, three black-clad men with AK-47 assault rifles entered the hall. Witnesses heard shouts of “Allahu akbar” just before the gunmen calmly and methodically opened fire into the crowd. A witness said that he saw armed men enter the Bataclan, not wearing masks, and fire indiscriminately on the crowd. The attack lasted about 20 minutes, with witnesses reporting that the attackers also threw grenades into the crowd. A radio reporter, Julien Pearce, who attended the concert, described the attackers as calm and determined, telling CNN they had reloaded three or four times.
At around 22:00, the men started rounding up hostages, as police massed outside the concert hall. Between 60 and 100 hostages were taken. The band’s members escaped without injury. A witness who escaped the attack told a journalist that they mentioned Syria. One witness in the Bataclan stated that a gunman yelled, “This is because of all the harm done by Hollande to Muslims all over the world.” There were further attacks reported on police and first responders who arrived at the scene after initial reports of shooting inside the theatre.
At about 00:15, the police started an assault on the theatre after reports that the attackers had started killing the hostages. The siege ended at 00:58. Initial police reports indicated that an estimated 100 people were killed at the theatre; the toll was later revised to 87. Two attackers died by detonating their suicide vests. One was hit by police gunfire, and his vest blew up when he fell. The entire area was closed off after the attacks. The identification and removal of bodies from the theatre took ten hours, a process made more difficult because some concert attendees had left their identification papers with the Bataclan’s cloakroom.

Identification

Paris Public Prosecutor François Molins confirmed that seven known attackers were killed, though authorities continued to search for the restaurant shooters.
  • Three attacked the Bataclan Theatre wearing black clothing and using AK-47 assault rifles. Two killed themselves with their suicide vests during the police raid on the theatre. The third was killed by police gunfire just before his vest detonated.
  • Three suicide bombers detonated their vests near the Stade de France. A Syrian passport was found on one of the suicide bombers, according to the French Police. The authenticity of the passport was questioned and many analysts pointed out that false Syrian passports can be easily obtained. Minister of Citizen Protection in Greece Nikos Toskasannounced that one of the Syrian passport-holders had passed through Leros in October, documents and fingerprints have to be matched with the the actual attacker to establish whether he passed through Greece, or obtained the passport along the way. It was also reported that an Egyptian passport was found close to the body of another bomber. CBS News, quoting a US intelligence official, suggested that the document did not have the correct numbering for a Syrian passport and its picture did not match the name given.
  • The seventh attacker detonated his vest on the boulevard Voltaire near the Bataclan theatre.

 Comparison

Michael Leiter, former director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center, said that the attacks demonstrated “a level of sophistication we really haven’t seen in an urban area since 2008 in the attack in Mumbai, India,” and that “this will be a game changer for how the West looks at this threat.” Further comparisons were made between the Paris attacks and the 2008 Mumbai attacks.

Government in action

President François Hollande issued a statement asking the French people to remain strong in the face of such incidents. Hollande also visited the Bataclan theatre and vowed to “mercilessly” fight against terrorism. Hollande also chaired an emergency meeting of the French Cabinet that night, and directed his national security council to meet the next morning. The authorities urged the residents of Paris to stay indoors for their own safety. Hollande also cancelled his trip to the 2015 G-20 Antalya summit because of the attacks, instead sending Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius and Finance Minister Michel Sapin as his representatives. On 14 November, President Hollande announced three national days of mourning.

Intelligence review


French police gathering evidence at the Bataclan theatre the day after the attacks
Shortly after the attacks, intelligence staff in multiple countries began to review electronic surveillance recorded before the attacks. The ranking Democratic member of the United States House of Representatives Intelligence Committee said that he was not aware of any intercepted communications that would have provided warning.
One source said that the French National Police met with German police and intelligence services a month prior to the attack to discuss suspicions that terrorists were conducting surveillance of possible French targets. The exact targets were not known at that time.
Suspicions emerged that at least some of the weapons used by the attackers may have been stolen from a French military armoury in July.
Police in Germany stopped a car on 5 November and confiscated weapons.

Security changes

In response to the attacks, France was put under a state of emergency for the first time since 2005, borders were temporarily closed, and 1,500 soldiers were called in to help the police maintain order in Paris. The plan blanc (Île de France) and plan rouge (global), two contingency plans for times of emergency, were immediately activated. According to some English-language sources, Paris declared its first curfew in 70 years. In addition, Belgium tightened security along its border with France and increased security checks for people arriving from France.
Flights to and from Charles de Gaulle Airport and Orly Airport were mostly unaffected. American Airlines delayed flights to Paris until further notice.[141]Many Paris Métro stations in the 10th and 11th arrondissements were shut down because of the attacks. Uber also suspended car hails in Paris after the attacks.

Police patrol in Paris, the day after the attacks
All public schools and universities in Paris were set to remain closed the next day. Sports events in France for the weekend of 14–15 November were postponed/cancelled. Disneyland Paris closed its parks for the first time, in solidarity with those who died in the attacks; it had operated every day since opening in 1992. The Eiffel Tower, a Paris landmark visited by 20,000 people a day, was closed indefinitely  According to The New York Times, as of 14 November 2015, “The capital is under a heavy police presence, and checks at France’s borders have been reinstated. Air travel continues but with significant security-related delays. Public protests—a constitutional right in France—are prohibited in Paris and some of the surrounding departments until Thursday. Many events ([14 November]’s U2 concert in Paris, as well as large photography exhibit) are canceled. Schools with classes or activities, cultural places and other venues (the Eiffel Tower, movie theaters, Disneyland Paris, department stores) are closed.”
New York and other cities in the United States took security precautions, particularly at sites where large crowds were expected, as well as sports events, concerts, the French embassy, and other French government sites. Singapore also raised its national security alert level, stepping up security precautions as well as border checks across the city-state. Police and military authorities in Manila were placed in full alert in preparation for the APEC Economic Leaders’ Meeting.

Social media and popular reactions

The hashtag #portesouvertes (“open doors”) was used by members of the public to offer shelter in Paris to those afraid to travel.

About the movement: Pray for Paris

In the wake of Friday’s deadly terror attacks in Paris, a simple and powerful image from artist Jean Julien has emerged as a symbol of support for the people of France.
Embedded image permalink

Should we pray for Paris?

Following the November 13 attacks on Paris, which killed 127 and wounded about 200 more, Indian blogger Karuna Ezara Parikh posted an emotional poem to her Instagram account explaining why she believes people should be praying for the entire world, not just Paris.
“It is not Paris we should pray for. It is the world,” Parikh wrote in her poem. “Say a prayer for Paris by all means, but pray for more.”
Now, thousands of people are sharing her words online. We originally saw them over at BuzzFeed.
Here’s the whole poem, originally shared on Parikh’s Instagram where it has been liked over 20,000 times.
Earlier today, after hearing about the devastating attacks in Paris, Delhi-based blogger Karuna Ezara Parikh wrote this poem and shared it on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter.
She also posted the poem to Facebook, where over 90,000 people have shared it. It’s being shared without attribution elsewhere, including Twitter.
Parikh included a lengthy caption explaining the inspiration for her poem.
Here’s the full caption:
I woke this morning deeply disturbed by the news from ‪#‎Paris‬, but more amazed by the attention it received on social media. I understand Paris is a beloved and familiar space for a lot of people, but it troubled me that ‪#‎Beirut‬, a city my father grew up in, had received so little attention after the horrific bombings two days earlier. It also troubled me that ‪#‎Baghdad‬, a place I have absolutely no connection with, received even less attention after the senseless bombing that took place there last week. Worst of all, I found the understanding of the refugee crisis skewed and simplistic. If you’ve been following the journeys of the people leaving their homes around the world right now, perhaps you’ll understand why the words ‪#‎SyrianRefugeeCrisis‬ are just as devastating as ‪#‎PrayForParis‬. It’s time to pray for humanity. It is time to make all places beloved. It’s time to pray for the world.